Shopping Cart

No products in the cart.


Lamarckism is an evolutionary theory first proposed by French naturalist Jean-Baptiste Lamarck in the early 19th century. It posits that organisms can inherit acquired traits and pass them on to their offspring. Though largely discredited in favor of Darwinism, recent discoveries in genetics and epigenetics have brought new attention to Lamarck’s ideas, leading to a resurgence of interest in Lamarckism.

Lamarckism in Evolution in Anthropology

The Life and Work of Jean-Baptiste Lamarck

Jean-Baptiste Pierre Antoine de Monet, Chevalier de Lamarck (1744-1829) was a French naturalist and biologist. He is best known for his work on the taxonomy of invertebrates and his development of the theory of the inheritance of acquired characteristics, which later became known as Lamarckism (Gould, 2002).

Key Principles of Lamarckism

Lamarckism is based on two main principles (Lamarck, 1809):

  1. Use and Disuse: The idea that the more an organ is used, the more developed and strengthened it becomes, whereas unused organs become weaker and eventually disappear.
  2. Inheritance of Acquired Characteristics: The concept that these changes acquired during an organism’s lifetime can be passed on to its offspring.

Historical Context and Reception of Lamarckism

In the early 19th century, Lamarckism provided a plausible explanation for the observed adaptations in organisms. However, the theory faced significant criticism from its inception, especially from proponents of Darwin’s theory of natural selection (Mayr, 1982). Over time, the lack of empirical evidence supporting Lamarckism and the rise of genetics led to its decline in popularity and acceptance within the scientific community.

Lamarckism vs. Darwinism Lamarckism and Darwinism are two competing theories that seek to explain the mechanisms of biological evolution. While both theories acknowledge the importance of adaptation and the role of environmental factors in shaping organisms, they differ significantly in their proposed mechanisms.

Table: Comparing Lamarckism and Darwinism

MechanismInheritance of acquired characteristicsNatural selection
BasisUse and disuse of organsVariation and differential reproduction
InheritanceAcquired traits are inheritedOnly genetic traits are inherited
Direction of EvolutionProgressive, goal-directedNon-directional, no inherent goal
Role of EnvironmentDirect influence on trait development and inheritanceIndirect
PredictabilityPredictable evolutionary trajectoriesUnpredictable evolutionary outcomes

Modern Perspectives on Lamarckism

Despite its decline in popularity, Lamarckism has experienced a resurgence of interest in recent years due to new discoveries in genetics and epigenetics. These fields have revealed mechanisms through which environmentally induced changes can be inherited, bringing some aspects of Lamarckism back into the scientific conversation.

Epigenetics and Neo-Lamarckism: Epigenetics is the study of heritable changes in gene expression that occur without changes in the underlying DNA sequence (Bird, 2007). These epigenetic changes can be influenced by environmental factors, and recent research has shown that they can be passed on to offspring, a phenomenon known as transgenerational epigenetic inheritance (Skinner, 2014). This has led some scientists to argue that aspects of Lamarckism may have some validity, giving rise to the concept of Neo-Lamarckism.

Lamarckism in the Digital Age: The digital age has also seen the emergence of digital organisms, artificial life simulations, and evolutionary algorithms that incorporate aspects of Lamarckism. These simulations have demonstrated that the inheritance of acquired characteristics can sometimes lead to faster adaptation and better performance in certain environments (Yedid & Bell, 2002).

Future Research Directions

The resurgence of interest in Lamarckism and the growing body of research in epigenetics and related fields presents new opportunities for future research. Some potential directions include:

  1. The Role of Epigenetics in Evolution Further research into the role of epigenetics in evolution is needed to better understand the extent to which environmentally induced changes can be inherited and contribute to evolutionary processes. This includes investigating the stability of epigenetic modifications across multiple generations and their potential role in driving speciation events.
  2. Integration of Lamarckian and Darwinian Mechanisms A deeper exploration of the interplay between Lamarckian and Darwinian mechanisms in evolutionary processes could provide a more holistic understanding of the factors driving adaptation and diversification in living organisms. This may involve the development of new mathematical models and computational simulations that incorporate both Lamarckian and Darwinian principles.
  3. The Role of Culture in Human Evolution Lamarckism has long been considered relevant in the context of cultural evolution, as cultural traits can be acquired and transmitted across generations. Future research could focus on understanding the role of cultural inheritance in shaping human evolution and the extent to which it complements or competes with genetic inheritance.

Implications for Education and Public Understanding The ongoing debate and research surrounding Lamarckism highlights the importance of maintaining an open mind and fostering critical thinking in the study and teaching of evolutionary biology. Presenting students with multiple perspectives on evolutionary processes, including the historical context and recent developments in the field, can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the complexity of evolution and the nature of scientific inquiry.


Lamarckism, once a dominant theory in the field of evolutionary biology, has experienced a resurgence of interest due to discoveries in genetics and epigenetics. While it remains a controversial and debated concept, recent findings suggest that aspects of Lamarckism may hold some truth and warrant further exploration. As our understanding of the mechanisms of inheritance continues to evolve, the legacy of Lamarckism endures, reminding us that the story of evolution is far from simple and complete.


  • Bird, A. (2007). Perceptions of epigenetics. Nature, 447(7143), 396-398.
  • Gould, S. J. (2002). The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Harvard University Press.
  • Lamarck, J.-B. (1809). Philosophie Zoologique. Dentu et L’Auteur.
  • Mayr, E. (1982). The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance. Harvard University Press.
  • Skinner, M. K. (2014). Environmental epigenetics and a unified theory of the molecular aspects of evolution: A neo-Lamarckian concept that facilitates neo-Darwinian evolution. Genome Biology and Evolution, 7(5), 1296-1302.
  • Yedid, G., & Bell, G. (2002). Macroevolution simulated with autonomously replicating computer programs. Nature, 420(6917), 810-812.

Suggested Articles

ParallelismGausse’s RuleDollo’s Rule
Cope’s RuleCataclysmSpeciation
Adaptive RadiationMosaic EvolutionPreformationism
Survival of the FittestTheory of EpigenesisTheories of Evolution
Avatar photo

Anthroholic helps the world learn Anthropology for Free. We strive to provide comprehensive and high quality content for deep understanding of the discipline.

Articles: 400

Newsletter Updates

Enter your email address below and subscribe to our newsletter

Leave a Reply